Let us revisit the geometric progression sum considered in an earlier article,
sr=k=0∑∞rk=1+r+r2+r3+…,
where r here is a complex number. For what values of r does this infinite sum make sense? Can we find a closed-form expression for sr in such cases? To investigate this, we fix r to some value and consider the partial sums:
sr(n)=k=0∑nrk=1+r+r2+…+rn−1,
where we just add the first n terms of sr. Now if sr(n) tends to a finite limit v as n→∞ (can we for any δ>0 find an n0 such that ∣v−sr(n)∣≤δ for all n≥n0?) then we have sr=v.
Let us first single out the special case r=1. Since sr(n)=n we cannot assign any well-defined, finite value to s1, so sr is divergent for r=1. For r=1 we get
(1−r)sr(n)=1−rn⟺sr(n)=1−r1−rn.
Let us consider three different cases. If ∣r∣<1 we see that the only term that depends on n tends to zero so we suspect that the limit is 1/(1−r),
1−r1−1−r1−rn=1−rrn=∣1−r∣∣r∣n.
Since the magnitude of the difference between our suspected limit and the partial sums can be made as small as we like (as long as we choose n sufficiently large), we have
sr=1−r1,for ∣r∣<1.
What about ∣r∣>1? We get
∣sr(n)∣=1−r1−rn≥∣r−1∣∣rn∣−1≥∣r∣+1∣r∣n−1,
and we see that ∣sr(n)∣→∞ as n→∞. We can thus not find a finite limit to which sr(n) tends as n→∞, so the series sr is divergent for ∣r∣>1.
Left to consider is the case ∣r∣=1, r=1, and this is where it gets interesting. We get
So the partial sums sr(n) are bounded by some constant independent of n. Does the value 1/(1−r) work as a limit in this case also? We set r=eiθ with 0<θ<2π and subtract,
(using eix+eiy=2cos((x−y)/2)ei(x+y)/2 and sinθ=2sin(θ/2)cos(θ/2)). So sr(n) does not converge to 1/(1−r) as n→∞. Indeed, we see that sr(n) follows a circle in the complex plane; a circle centered in 1/(1−r) with radius 1/(2sin(θ/2)). And this is what I find interesting: sr(n) does not converge to any value,
the series sr is divergent for ∣r∣≥1,
but circles around the value 1/(1−r) when ∣r∣=1, r=1. In fact, 1/(1−r) makes sense for all r=1, so can this value be assigned to sr in some meaningful way? (When ∣r∣<1, I would suspect that the values of sr(n) spirals inward towards 1/(1−r) as n grows and spirals outwards when ∣r∣>1; I have not verified this, though.)
This reminded me that G. H. Hardy has written a book called Divergent Series, where he manipulates infinite series with an “entirely uncritical spirit”. Therein, he also considers the series sr and, e.g., s−1=1/2 can somehow make sense. I have only flicked through the book (excerpt), but I think I should take a closer look…