Peaucellier–Lipkin Linkage

Published on

Consider the device shown in the animation below. It consists entirely of rigid rods joined at pivot points.

The Peaucellier–Lipkin linkage, with P' on a straight line

It is called the Peaucellier–Lipkin linkage, named after Charles-Nicolas Peaucellier, who invented it in 1864, and Yom Tov Lipman Lipkin, who discovered it independently in 1871.

It has the special property of transforming rotary motion into straight-line motion, and vice versa. This post examines why this works.

Let us first introduce some parameters. Let the two long black rods have length LL. They are joined at the anchor point OO. Each rod of the blue rhombus has length ss. The green rod is anchored at CC, at distance rr from OO, and has length rr as well.

We start by considering the long rods and the rhombus by themselves. We will require that s<Ls < L, which makes the rhombus fit inside the two long rods.

The Peaucellier–Lipkin linkage without the green rod

The long rods join OO to the points AA and BB, and the rhombus is APBP′APBP'. The midpoint of the rhombus is denoted MM. The diagonals ABAB and PP′PP' of the rhombus are perpendicular and bisect each other at MM. Since OO is equally far from AA and BB, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of ABAB, which is the line through PP and P′P'.

Using the Pythagorean Theorem on the right-angled triangles OAMOAM and APMAPM, we get L2=∣OM∣2+∣AM∣2L^2 = \lvert OM \rvert^2 + \lvert AM \rvert^2 and s2=∣PM∣2+∣AM∣2s^2 = \lvert PM \rvert^2 + \lvert AM \rvert^2. Then we have

L2−s2=∣OM∣2−∣PM∣2=(∣OM∣−∣PM∣)(∣OM∣+∣PM∣)=∣OP∣∣OP′∣.L^2 - s^2 = \lvert OM \rvert^2 - \lvert PM \rvert^2 = (\lvert OM \rvert - \lvert PM \rvert) (\lvert OM \rvert + \lvert PM \rvert) = \lvert OP \rvert \lvert OP' \rvert.

Since ∣OM∣2−∣PM∣2=L2−s2>0\lvert OM \rvert^2 - \lvert PM \rvert^2 = L^2 - s^2 > 0, we have ∣OM∣>∣PM∣\lvert OM \rvert > \lvert PM \rvert, so OO lies outside the segment PP′PP' and PP and P′P' are on the same ray from OO.

The two factors ∣OM∣−∣PM∣\lvert OM \rvert - \lvert PM \rvert and ∣OM∣+∣PM∣\lvert OM \rvert + \lvert PM \rvert are therefore the distances from OO to the closer and the farther of the points PP and P′P'. The product does not depend on which is which, so the relation holds whether PP is the closer or the farther of the two. This means that the points PP and P′P' are each other's (circle) inverses.

Now for the green rod. It joins PP to the anchor point CC, and since ∣OC∣=∣CP∣=r\lvert OC \rvert = \lvert CP \rvert = r, the point PP is constrained to move on the circle with center CC and radius rr, which passes through OO. Let QQ be the point on this circle opposite OO, so that CC is halfway between OO and QQ, and let Q′Q' be the inverse of QQ. Now let PP be anywhere else on the circle, off the OQOQ line.

Two positions of the Peaucellier–Lipkin linkage, with P on a circle through O

We have ∣OQ∣∣OQ′∣=∣OP∣∣OP′∣=L2−s2\lvert OQ \rvert \lvert OQ' \rvert = \lvert OP \rvert \lvert OP' \rvert = L^2 - s^2 and thus

∣OP∣∣OQ′∣=∣OQ∣∣OP′∣.\frac{\lvert OP \rvert}{\lvert OQ' \rvert} = \frac{\lvert OQ \rvert}{\lvert OP' \rvert}.

Since Q′Q' lies on the ray OQOQ and P′P' lies on the ray OPOP, the triangles OPQOPQ and OQ′P′OQ'P' share the angle ∠QOP=∠Q′OP′\angle QOP = \angle Q'OP'. This proportionality and the shared angle imply that the triangles OPQOPQ and OQ′P′OQ'P' are similar.

Now for the final part: Since PP is a point on the circle where OQOQ is a diameter, the angle ∠OPQ\angle OPQ is a right angle by Thales's Theorem. From the similarity we then have that ∠OQ′P′\angle OQ'P' is a right angle. And since PP was chosen arbitrarily (off the OQOQ line), this will be true for any position of PP on the circle.

So P′P' always lies on the line through Q′Q' perpendicular to OQ′OQ'. In other words, as PP moves on its circle, P′P' moves on a straight line, at distance ∣OQ′∣=(L2−s2)/(2r)\lvert OQ' \rvert = (L^2 - s^2)/(2r) from OO.

You can also explore the linkage interactively in the lab.

Feel free to leave any question, correction or comment in this Mastodon thread.