Series: Finite Element MethodContinuous

General Elliptic PDEs

Published on

The Poisson problem is a special case of a much broader family of PDEs. A general second-order linear elliptic PDE on a domain ΩRn\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n can be written as

Lu=fin Ω,Lu = f \quad \text{in } \Omega,

where LL is a second-order linear differential operator and f:ΩRf : \Omega \to \mathbb{R} is a given source term. A canonical form of LL is

Lu=(Au)+bu+cu,Lu = -\nabla \cdot (A \nabla u) + \mathbf{b} \cdot \nabla u + c\, u,

where A:ΩRn×nA : \Omega \to \mathbb{R}^{n \times n} is matrix-valued, b:ΩRn\mathbf{b} : \Omega \to \mathbb{R}^n is vector-valued, and c:ΩRc : \Omega \to \mathbb{R} is scalar-valued. The three terms are conventionally called the diffusion, convection, and reaction terms. The Poisson equation corresponds to A=IA = I, b=0\mathbf{b} = 0, c=0c = 0.

The term elliptic refers to a condition on AA alone. The operator LL is uniformly elliptic if there exists a constant α>0\alpha > 0 such that

ξTA(x)ξαξ2for all ξRn and almost all xΩ.\xi^T A(x)\, \xi \geq \alpha |\xi|^2 \quad \text{for all } \xi \in \mathbb{R}^n \text{ and almost all } x \in \Omega.

For symmetric A(x)A(x) this says that A(x)A(x) is positive definite, uniformly in xx: the quadratic form associated with the second-order part of LL is bounded away from zero in every direction. (For nonsymmetric A(x)A(x) the requirement falls on its symmetric part, as the skew-symmetric part contributes nothing to the quadratic form.) This is what places LL in the elliptic class of the standard classification of second-order linear operators, alongside the parabolic and hyperbolic classes; see elliptic operator for the general definition in terms of the principal symbol.

Boundary conditions are of the same Dirichlet and Neumann types introduced for the Poisson problem. The natural generalisation of the normal derivative is the conormal derivative (Au)n(A \nabla u) \cdot \mathbf{n}, and the Neumann condition reads (Au)n=gN(A \nabla u) \cdot \mathbf{n} = g_N on ΓN\Gamma_N. For A=IA = I this is u/n=gN\partial u / \partial n = g_N, recovering the Poisson case.

Particular choices of coefficients give equations with names of their own. With A=IA = I, b=0\mathbf{b} = 0 and cc a negative constant one obtains the Helmholtz equation, and with cc a positive constant the screened Poisson equation.

Well-posedness — existence, uniqueness, and continuous dependence of uu on ff — is the central question before attempting a numerical solution. Under sufficient conditions on AA, b\mathbf{b}, cc, and the domain, classical results guarantee that the boundary value problem Lu=fLu = f has a unique solution that depends stably on the data. A freely available treatment is John K. Hunter's Notes on Partial Differential Equations, whose chapter on elliptic PDEs covers precisely this setting. The precise hypotheses and proofs are also given in Evans, Partial Differential Equations (AMS, 2010), Chapter 6, which is the standard graduate reference. A more numerically oriented treatment can be found in Brenner and Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Chapter 5.

The precise mechanism by which well-posedness is established — via a weak formulation and the Lax–Milgram theorem — is the subject of the next posts.

Feel free to leave any question, correction or comment in this Mastodon thread.