General Elliptic PDEs
The Poisson problem is a special case of a much broader family of PDEs. A general second-order linear elliptic PDE on a domain can be written as
where is a second-order linear differential operator and is a given source term. A canonical form of is
where is matrix-valued, is vector-valued, and is scalar-valued. The three terms are conventionally called the diffusion, convection, and reaction terms. The Poisson equation corresponds to , , .
The term elliptic refers to a condition on alone. The operator is uniformly elliptic if there exists a constant such that
For symmetric this says that is positive definite, uniformly in : the quadratic form associated with the second-order part of is bounded away from zero in every direction. (For nonsymmetric the requirement falls on its symmetric part, as the skew-symmetric part contributes nothing to the quadratic form.) This is what places in the elliptic class of the standard classification of second-order linear operators, alongside the parabolic and hyperbolic classes; see elliptic operator for the general definition in terms of the principal symbol.
Boundary conditions are of the same Dirichlet and Neumann types introduced for the Poisson problem. The natural generalisation of the normal derivative is the conormal derivative , and the Neumann condition reads on . For this is , recovering the Poisson case.
Particular choices of coefficients give equations with names of their own. With , and a negative constant one obtains the Helmholtz equation, and with a positive constant the screened Poisson equation.
Well-posedness — existence, uniqueness, and continuous dependence of on — is the central question before attempting a numerical solution. Under sufficient conditions on , , , and the domain, classical results guarantee that the boundary value problem has a unique solution that depends stably on the data. A freely available treatment is John K. Hunter's Notes on Partial Differential Equations, whose chapter on elliptic PDEs covers precisely this setting. The precise hypotheses and proofs are also given in Evans, Partial Differential Equations (AMS, 2010), Chapter 6, which is the standard graduate reference. A more numerically oriented treatment can be found in Brenner and Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Chapter 5.
The precise mechanism by which well-posedness is established — via a weak formulation and the Lax–Milgram theorem — is the subject of the next posts.